|
JURY DEBATES OVER TUTOR'S FATE
This is the actual jury verdict from the form the jury will fill in how much TUTOR must
pay for each of his wrong acts.
SUPERIOR COURT
OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY
OF LOS ANGELES
TUTOR-SALIBA-PERINI,
J.V., v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
CASE NO. BC
123559
SPECIAL VERDICT
FORM
We, the jury in
the above-entitled action, find damages in favor of cross-complaint the Los Angeles County
Metropolitan Transportation Authority and against cross-defendants Tutor-Saliba-Perini,
J.V., Tutor-Saliba Corporation, Perini Corporation, the Aetna Casualty & Surety
Company, Fidelity & Deposit company of Maryland, and North American Reinsurance
Corporation as follows:
For frontloading
as against Tutor-Saliba-Perini, J.V., Tutor-Saliba Corporation and Perini Corporation
(hereafter "TSP cross-defendants") for breach of Contract B221,B231 and B211and
for false claims, false records and false statement penalties, plus unfair and/or unlawful
business practice penalties related to this conduct in the sum of $__________.
For
subcontractor listing and substitution violations against the TSP cross-defendants for
breach of Contract B221, B231 and B211 and for false claims, false records and false
statement penalties, plus unfair and/or unlawful business practice penalties related to
this conduct in the sum of $__________.
For
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise violations against the TSP cross-defendants for beach of
Contract B221, B231 and B211 and for false claims, false records and false statement
penalties, plus unfair and/or unlawful business practice penalties related to this conduct
in the sum of $__________.
For
subcontractor licensing violations against the TSP cross-defendants for beach of Contract
B221, B231 and B211 and for false claims, false records and false statement penalties,
plus unfair and/or unlawful business practice penalties related to this conduct in the sum
of $__________.
For quality
assurance/quality control violations against TSP cross-defendants beach of Contract B221
and for false claims, false records and false statement penalties, plus unfair and/or
unlawful business practice penalties related to this conduct in the sum of $__________.
For Buy American
violations against the TSP cross-defendants for breach of Contract B221 and B231 and for
false claims, false records and false statement penalties, plus unfair and/or unlawful
business practice penalties related to this conduct in the sum of $__________.
For breach of
contract, including actual and trebled damages, plus penalties related to the following
submission of false claims/false records/false statements, unfair and/or unlawful business
practices pertaining to Contract B221:
Pile
Interference, TSP Claim $__________. Pile Interference, Subcontractor Claims $__________.
Tunnel Handrails
(Change Order) $__________.
Escalator
Cladding Claim $__________.
Stair Nosings
(Change Order) $__________.
Bridging Beam
Claim $__________.
Night
Restriction, Slab on Grand (Change Order) $__________.
Night
Restriction, Side Structures (Change Order) $__________.
Night
Restriction, Accucrete (Change Order) $__________.
Night
Restriction, Box, TSP Inefficiency Claim $__________.
Night
Restriction, Box TSP Delay Claim $__________.
Night
Restriction, Box, Subcontractor Claims $__________.
Earthquake
Direct Damage Claim $__________.
Claim
"R" Station Completion Delay $__________.
Claim
"S" Wilshire Street Restoration $__________.
Claim
"T" - Unresolved Project Completion Delay $__________.
For liquidated
damages in breach of Contract B221 against the TSP cross-defendants in the sum of
$__________.
As against the
Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland and North
American Reinsurance Corporation bonding companies, we find liability for the same TSP
breaches of Contract B221 with respect to each of the foregoing matters in the sum of
$__________.
We, the jury in
the above-entitled action, also find that the unfair competition and/or unlawful business
practices of the TSP cross-defendants separately warrant restitution and/or disgorgement
of funds received from the MTA in the sum of $__________.
DATED:__________________
By:__________________
FOREPERSON
ENTER OUR
CONTEST
Guess what the
Jury Verdict will be, and the closest guess wins an assortment of union paraphernelia.
Horacio
Grana..........................$ 75,000,000.00
G.
Schneiderman......................$ 123,000,000.00
John
Walsh..............................$ 164,000,000.00
Doug
McCarron.......................$ ____________
Richard
Blum...........................$ ____________
Don't laugh too
hard! Our UBC Pension takes a HIT here since Perini is 40% liable for these losses.
Blum should have
kept a shorter leash on "HIS MAD DOG" TUTOR.
|
